Catastrophic Injury · Commercial Vehicles
California Trucking Accident Attorney
Civil trial representation for people seriously injured by tractor-trailers, big rigs, delivery vehicles, and other commercial trucks. These cases begin with the operation, the people and companies involved, and the evidence each one controls.
Preserve the evidence. Identify the governing rules. Test each theory.
Read client stories and review sourcesPast results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Four early decisions shape a trucking case
- Classify the operation. Interstate or intrastate, property or passenger, vehicle size, cargo, route, and any exemption can change which federal and state rules apply.
- Identify evidence by custodian. The carrier may control electronic logging and dispatch data; other companies may control the tractor, trailer, maintenance, cargo, cameras, telematics, or employment records. Public agencies and third parties may hold separate scene evidence.
- Map each actor’s actual role. Contracts and labels are starting points. Responsibility depends on conduct, control, agency, applicable law, and proof of causation.
- Separate liability, damages, coverage, and collection. A serious injury does not prove fault, a regulatory violation does not automatically decide liability, and multiple policies do not automatically combine.
Federal safety rules are evidence, not automatic liability
For property-carrying drivers subject to 49 C.F.R. § 395.3, the general rule permits up to 11 hours of driving after 10 consecutive hours off duty, prohibits driving beyond the 14th consecutive hour after coming on duty, and requires a 30-minute non-driving interruption after eight cumulative hours of driving. Exceptions and special operations matter. Maintenance duties appear in 49 C.F.R. § 396.3, and other parts address qualification, inspection, cargo securement, controlled substances, and alcohol.
A violation is not automatically negligence per se. California Evidence Code § 669 requires, among other things, a qualifying violation, proximate causation, the kind of occurrence the rule was designed to prevent, and an injured person within the protected class. Its presumption is rebuttable. The case therefore turns on the rule’s applicability and its connection to the crash, not the citation alone.
Preserve the right evidence, with the right company
FMCSA explains that motor carriers subject to 49 C.F.R. § 395.8(k) generally retain records of duty status and supporting documents for six months. That period does not govern every item. Section 396.3, for example, uses a different rule for required vehicle-maintenance records. Company retention practices for camera footage, telematics, electronic control module data, messages, and other evidence may be shorter or longer.
A useful preservation plan names the vehicles, time period, data systems, custodians, and categories at issue; preserves the claimant’s own photos, messages, devices, and medical records; and considers whether formal discovery or a court order is needed. A letter alone does not establish liability or guarantee that every requested item exists.
Responsibility follows proof of role and causation
Potentially relevant actors can include the driver, motor carrier, tractor or trailer owner, maintenance provider, employer, cargo-loading party, and in some cases a broker or shipper. Whether any one belongs in the case depends on what it undertook, controlled, knew, and did, as well as the governing agency, tort, contract, and preemption rules. Naming every participant without that analysis can waste time and obscure the strongest theory.
Coverage and damages require documents, not assumptions
49 C.F.R. § 387.9 sets a $750,000 minimum for certain for-hire interstate carriers transporting nonhazardous property in vehicles rated at 10,001 pounds or more, with $1 million and $5 million minimums for specified hazardous-material operations. The actual coverage inquiry requires the operation, cargo, endorsements, policies, insureds, exclusions, contracts, and any self-insurance. Separate policies are not automatically stackable.
Damages likewise depend on proof: medical diagnosis and treatment, reasonable future needs supported by qualified evidence, earnings history and work capacity, household services, out-of-pocket losses, liens and offsets, and the effect of comparative fault. No collision type supplies a preset value.
Do not use the general filing period as a preservation calendar
Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 generally provides two years for an action for injury or death caused by another’s wrongful act or neglect. Public-entity procedures, other causes of action, parties, and accrual rules can produce different or earlier requirements. The correct deadline must be calculated from the actual facts and documents. Evidence preservation often needs attention long before suit is due.
Serving Fresno & the Central Valley
From its Fresno office, the firm evaluates serious commercial-vehicle matters arising on Highway 99, Interstate 5, and other Central Valley routes, as well as suitable matters elsewhere in California. Acceptance depends on the facts, parties, venue, timing, and the firm’s ability to undertake the work.
The proper court is a legal question. A regional crash may proceed in a California superior court when venue is proper; federal court requires an independent basis for subject-matter jurisdiction. The office is located at 1265 W. Shaw Ave., Suite 100, Fresno. See the communities we serve →
Sources and editorial responsibility
Law Offices of David L. Milligan, APC. Updated September 7, 2026. Prepared with AI assistance; the linked federal regulations, FMCSA guidance, and California statutes were checked for this revision.
Primary and agency sources: 49 C.F.R. § 395.3; FMCSA retention guidance; 49 C.F.R. § 396.3; 49 C.F.R. § 387.9; Evidence Code § 669; and Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1.
Common Questions
Which trucking records may have a short regulatory retention period?
FMCSA states that carriers subject to 49 C.F.R. § 395.8 generally must retain drivers’ records of duty status and supporting documents for six months. Different rules govern maintenance, qualification, testing, video, telematics, and other records. A preservation request should identify the evidence and the entities that control it rather than assume one deadline covers everything.
Does an FMCSA violation automatically prove negligence in California?
No. Under California Evidence Code § 669, a qualifying violation can create a rebuttable presumption only if the violation proximately caused the injury, the occurrence was of the type the rule was designed to prevent, and the injured person was within the protected class. The regulation must also apply to the operation at issue.
Who may be responsible after a commercial-truck crash?
The answer depends on actual roles and evidence. Potentially relevant actors can include the driver, motor carrier, vehicle or trailer owner, maintenance provider, cargo-loading party, and in some cases a broker or shipper. A company name on a document or a separate insurance policy does not by itself establish liability or available coverage.
What are the basic federal hours-of-service limits for property-carrying drivers?
Subject to exceptions, 49 C.F.R. § 395.3 generally permits up to 11 hours of driving after 10 consecutive hours off duty, bars driving beyond the 14th consecutive hour after coming on duty, and requires a 30-minute non-driving interruption after eight cumulative hours of driving. The correct analysis must account for the type of operation and any applicable exception.
How much liability insurance does federal law require?
49 C.F.R. § 387.9 sets a $750,000 minimum for certain for-hire interstate carriers of nonhazardous property in vehicles rated at 10,001 pounds or more, with $1 million and $5 million minimums for specified hazardous-material operations. Whether that rule applies and what additional policies or insured parties exist require the actual operation, cargo, policies, and contracts. Policies are not automatically stacked.
What filing deadline applies to a California truck-crash claim?
Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 generally provides two years for an action for injury or death caused by another’s wrongful act or neglect. That is not a universal deadline: public-entity claims, different causes of action, parties, and accrual rules can change the analysis. Evidence may also disappear well before a filing deadline.
To request an initial case review:
“The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury.”
Chief Justice John Marshall · Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Important: This page is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Submitting an inquiry does not by itself create an attorney–client relationship or protect a deadline. Do not send records or unnecessary sensitive facts unless requested. The office will confirm in writing if it accepts representation. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. The legal framework applicable to a specific case depends on the facts. David L. Milligan is licensed to practice law in California.