Skip to main content

Catastrophic Injury · Bicycle

California Bicycle Accident Attorney

Civil representation for cyclists seriously injured by vehicles, dooring incidents, infrastructure failures, or hit-and-run drivers in California.

Vulnerable users, often serious injuries.

Cyclists are vulnerable road users

California law treats bicycles as vehicles for most rules of the road (Cal. Veh. Code § 21200), but the physical reality is different — a cyclist has no protective shell. Even a low-speed collision with a vehicle can produce severe injuries: traumatic brain injury, spinal injury, fractures, road rash, and fatalities. Properly prepared bicycle cases focus on (a) the at-fault driver's specific negligence, (b) the absence of contributory fault by the cyclist, and (c) the full extent of injuries.

Common case scenarios

  • Right-hook collisions — vehicle turns right across cyclist's path
  • Left-cross collisions — vehicle turning left fails to yield to oncoming cyclist
  • Dooring — parked vehicle's driver opens door into cyclist's path (Cal. Veh. Code § 22517)
  • Rear-end collisions — vehicle strikes cyclist from behind
  • Hit-and-run — driver flees the scene
  • Roadway and infrastructure hazards — potholes, defective bike lanes, missing signage (premises or government liability)
  • Trail and path collisions — including with other users or unsafe conditions

Applicable California law

Cal. Veh. Code § 21200 (bicycles subject to vehicle code); § 22517 (dooring); §§ 21202–21210 (lane positioning, paths, sidewalks); Cal. Civ. Code § 1714 (negligence); Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 (statute of limitations). For government infrastructure cases, Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2 imposes a six-month claim presentation deadline.

Insurance coverage analysis

Cycle-vs-vehicle cases typically involve the at-fault driver's auto insurance. Where the driver is uninsured or underinsured, the cyclist's own auto insurance UM/UIM coverage may apply (yes — auto policies generally cover the insured while cycling). Hit-and-run cases trigger UM coverage. We work through the coverage analysis as part of every case workup.

Damages

Bicycle cases are typically damages-driven because the injuries are usually serious. Recoverable damages include past and future medical expenses, lost earnings and lost earning capacity, life-care needs for severe injuries, pain and suffering, scarring and disfigurement, and punitive damages where defendant conduct supports them (e.g., DUI-caused crashes, hit-and-run flight).

Common Questions

I was hit by a hit-and-run driver. Can I still recover?

Often yes, through your own auto insurance UM (uninsured motorist) coverage. Most California auto policies include UM coverage that applies to the insured while cycling. Hit-and-run is treated as an uninsured-motorist event.

I wasn't wearing a helmet. Does that hurt my case?

California requires helmets only for cyclists under 18 (Cal. Veh. Code § 21212). For adults, failure to wear a helmet may be admissible on damages mitigation for head injuries, not on liability for the crash itself. Lower-body injuries are unaffected.

The cyclist crashed without contact from a vehicle — can I still sue?

Sometimes yes. If the crash was caused by a roadway defect, debris, dooring, or another driver forcing evasive action, there may be a viable claim against a non-vehicle defendant (city, county, property owner, or the driver who created the hazard).

Are bicycle cases different from car accident cases?

Yes. Defense often presses contributory-fault arguments ("the cyclist shouldn't have been there"), and juries sometimes carry biases. Trial-ready preparation matters more in bicycle cases than in routine car accidents.

For a confidential review of your case:

“The cases we take are cases where the medical proof can carry the damages. That is not rhetoric — it is the test every file gets at intake.”

Law Offices of David L. Milligan · Fresno, California

Important: This page is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Submitting an inquiry does not create an attorney–client relationship; that relationship is formed only by a written agreement signed after we evaluate the matter for conflicts and merit. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Statutory citations are illustrative; the legal framework applicable to a specific case depends on the facts. The Law Offices of David L. Milligan is licensed in California.