Skip to main content

Milligan Legal Notes · Pro Bono Programs

What Is Limited-Scope (Unbundled) Representation in California — and Can It Cover a Jury Trial?

By David L. Milligan ·

Most people picture legal representation as all-or-nothing: either a lawyer takes the whole case, or you are on your own. California law recognizes a third path. Under Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(b), a lawyer may limit the scope of a representation — taking on one defined piece of a case — if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances, is not otherwise prohibited by law, and the client gives informed consent. Lawyers call it limited-scope or “unbundled” representation. Done properly, it puts skilled counsel on the piece of the case where counsel matters most, at a fraction of the commitment of full representation.

How a limited-scope engagement is built

A careful limited-scope agreement states exactly what the lawyer will do; lists what is excluded; allocates deadlines in plain words; records the client’s informed consent; and explains how the representation will be completed through an effective substitution or court-authorized relief when required. Where the lawyer appears in court for a limited purpose, applicable court procedures govern both entry and withdrawal. The writing gives both sides a clear assignment, but it does not override duties of competence, diligence, communication, continuing transition duties, or duties imposed by the court.

Where the edges are

A limited scope identifies the subject matter the lawyer agrees to handle; work outside that reasonable scope is not automatically included. Before accepting, the lawyer must determine that the assignment can be performed competently and diligently within its limits. If circumstances materially change, the lawyer must consult the client and comply with professional duties and applicable court procedures. A change does not automatically expand the engagement into full representation or a full case workup; the lawyer may instead seek withdrawal or other appropriate relief, while remaining responsible until that relief is effective.

Two working examples from this office

This firm runs two pro bono programs built on the limited-scope model. In the jury-trial program, a self-represented plaintiff may send an early written inquiry for preliminary factual screening, but sending it does not by itself create an attorney–client relationship, reserve the firm, transfer responsibility for the case or a deadline, or start a full case workup. The firm accepts representation only through a signed written limited-scope agreement and becomes counsel of record only when its substitution is filed. Acceptance still requires a failed mandatory settlement conference and the firm’s five-day interval before the applicable pre-trial document deadline. If accepted, the agreed services cover required pre-trial documents and the scheduled jury trial; earlier litigation, a continued trial date, a retrial, and post-trial work are not automatically included. If the scheduled trial concludes or is continued, the firm remains counsel of record until a substitution or relief order ending its role is filed, served, and effective. In the DMV hearing program, the offered engagement covers a single administrative hearing through the hearing officer’s decision. Each program depends on a written, reasonable scope and compliance with the professional duties and procedures that govern the representation.

Common questions

Is limited-scope representation allowed in California?

Yes. California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(b) permits a lawyer to limit the scope of a representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances, is not otherwise prohibited by law, and the client gives informed consent. Courts also have procedures for lawyers who appear for a limited purpose in civil cases.

What does a limited-scope lawyer NOT do?

Work outside a reasonable written scope is not automatically included. The agreement should identify the offered and excluded tasks, allocate deadlines, and explain how the representation will be completed through an effective substitution or court-authorized relief when required. A fixed scope does not override duties of competence, diligence, communication, or duties imposed by the court. If circumstances materially change, the lawyer must consult the client and comply with professional duties and applicable court procedures; the change does not automatically expand the engagement to a full case workup.

Can limited scope really cover just a jury trial?

It can. One example is this office’s pro bono program for self-represented California plaintiffs. A person may send an early written inquiry for preliminary factual screening, but sending it does not by itself create an attorney-client relationship, reserve the firm, transfer responsibility for the case or a deadline, or start a full case workup. The firm accepts representation only through a signed written limited-scope agreement and becomes counsel of record only when its substitution is filed. Acceptance still requires a failed mandatory settlement conference and the firm’s five-day interval before the applicable pre-trial document deadline. If accepted, the agreed services cover required pre-trial documents and the scheduled jury trial; earlier litigation and post-trial work are not automatically included. The firm remains counsel of record until any substitution or relief order ending its role is filed, served, and effective.

What should I look for in a limited-scope agreement?

Look for a precise, reasonable scope; an express list of excluded work; allocation of deadlines; costs and case expenses; written informed consent; and the procedure for completing representation through an effective substitution or court-authorized relief when required. The agreement should also recognize that its fixed scope cannot override professional duties or court orders and that material changed circumstances require consultation and reassessment.

The two programs in detail: Pro Bono Jury Trials for Self-Represented Litigants · California DMV Hearings — Pro Bono.

Important: This article is general educational information and attorney advertising — not legal advice, and not an offer to represent you. Whether limited-scope representation fits a particular matter depends on its facts. The firm’s pro bono programs accept very few matters, in the firm’s sole discretion, and the firm responds only to inquiries it is considering. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. The Law Offices of David L. Milligan, APC is licensed in California.

← Back to Milligan Legal Notes